Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Development and in vitro evaluation of self-adhesive matrix-type transdermal delivery system of ondansetron hydrochloride

Sheba Rani Nakka David1,2 , Rajan Rajabalaya1,2, Eu Sheau Zhia1

1Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, BE1410, Negara Brunei Darussalam; 2International Medical University, No. 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

For correspondence:-  Sheba David   Email: sdsheba@gmail.com   Tel:+6732463001

Received: 22 April 2014        Revised: 18 December 2014        Published: 28 February 2015

Citation: David SR, Rajabalaya R, Zhia ES. Development and in vitro evaluation of self-adhesive matrix-type transdermal delivery system of ondansetron hydrochloride. Trop J Pharm Res 2015; 14(2):211-218 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i2.4

© 2015 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose:To develop and evaluate self-adhesive matrix-type ondansetron hydrochloride (OND) transdermal formulation.
Methods:OND transdermal patches were prepared using solvent casting method. The matrix polymer composition was Eudragit E 100, polyvinyl pyrrolidone and either propylene glycol or dibutyl sebacate as plasticizer. Mean patch thickness, tensile strength, moisture content, water absorption capacity and drug content of the patches were studied. In vitro release and permeation of the patches were determined using Franz diffusion cell.
Results:Mean patch thickness, moisture content, and water uptake increased with increased contents of polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) and plasticiser. Higher levels of PVP and plasticiser increased drug release. Addition of release modifier such as succinic acid (SA) and myristic acid (MA) to the patch formulations produced a significant increase in drug release from the patch. Higuchi plots for patches containing propylene glycol (PG) were non-linear (r2 = 0.9564), indicating that they did not follow Higuchi release model whereas the plots for most of the patches containing dibutyl sebacate (DBS) followed Higuchi release model (r2 = 0.9974).
Conclusion:DBS is a superior plasticiser to PG for OND matrix patches while succinic acid (SA) is a more effective release modifier than myristic acid (MA) for PG patches.

Keywords: Ondansetron hydrochloride, Drug release, Release modifier, Transdermal, Dibutyl sebacate, Succinic acid, Higuchi model, Plasticizer

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates